India Can Never Permit Others to Have a Veto on Its Choices: EAM Jaishankar
India’s foreign policy has consistently emphasized sovereignty and independent decision-making. Recently, External Affairs Minister (EAM) S. Jaishankar reiterated this stance, declaring that India will never allow external forces to have a veto on its choices. This strong assertion underlines the nation’s commitment to maintaining autonomy on the global stage.
India’s Stance on Sovereignty and Independence
India’s foreign policy has been grounded in the principles of self-reliance and strategic autonomy. These guiding principles reflect a historical legacy and continue to influence contemporary decisions.
Historical Background of India’s Foreign Policy
India’s commitment to sovereignty can be traced back to its leadership in the Non-Aligned Movement. During the Cold War, India stayed neutral, avoiding alignment with either the United States or the Soviet Union. This approach allowed the country to pursue policies tailored to its unique challenges and opportunities. Even today, this philosophy guides India’s stance in a world marked by shifting alliances. Learn more about the Non-Aligned Movement here.
Recent Statements by EAM Jaishankar
In an emphatic statement, EAM S. Jaishankar addressed international forums, asserting India’s right to act independently. He highlighted that no nation could impose its veto or influence India’s policy choices. This declaration sent a strong message that New Delhi would not compromise its sovereignty, regardless of global pressures. Read more about his statements on India’s autonomy here.
The Concept of Veto in International Relations
Veto power remains a contentious issue in global diplomacy, often determining the balance of power within international institutions.
Understanding Veto Power
Veto power is typically associated with permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). These nations—China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US—can override any substantive resolution. This often results in geopolitical deadlocks and constrains the UN’s effectiveness. Explore more about veto power in the UNSC here.
India’s Rejection of External Veto
India has consistently opposed the misuse of veto power and external interference. For instance, its firm stance on cross-border terrorism and economic policy reflects this rejection. By refusing to yield to external vetoes, India underscores its right to make choices that align with domestic interests.
Photo by Rahul Sapra
Consequences of Allowing External Veto
Allowing external vetoes could pose significant risks to India’s core interests, spanning security, economy, and geopolitics.
Impact on National Security
Accepting foreign veto power could undermine India’s ability to combat terrorism and safeguard its borders. External pressures may weaken its defense initiatives, affecting long-term national security. India’s robust measures against cross-border threats, particularly from neighboring states, emphasize its need to remain autonomous.
Effects on Economic Policies
India’s thriving economy depends heavily on independent decision-making. International pressures could jeopardize vital trade agreements, infrastructure projects, and partnerships. For example, India’s decisions under agreements like the International Solar Alliance showcase its global leadership without bowing to external vetoes.
Conclusion
India’s unwavering commitment to sovereignty ensures that no external force can dictate its path. As EAM Jaishankar’s recent statements highlight, India’s choices are rooted in its national interests, free from undue influence or pressure. This steadfast approach safeguards India’s security, economy, and voice in global diplomacy, reflecting a nation determined to chart its own course in a complex and interconnected world.